Machinist X79 Z9-D7 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardMachinist X79 Z9-D7 PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 04:07
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 82
2-Core 140
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 586
51% 436 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Nvidia(10DE 134D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.58
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.1% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 123
Parallax 108
90% 114 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 97
Splatting 91.5
86% 108 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN3.0 512GNVMe-M.2/80 512GB
463GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN06815 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1886 1871 1818 613 632 629 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,835
Write 2,170
Mixed 1,643
SusWrite 1,241
388% 1,722 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 65
213% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 647
DQ Write 411
DQ Mixed 573
416% 544 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 239%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Z9-D7 PRO Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Machinist X79 Z9-D7 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback