Yanling YPC-M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemYanling YPC-M3  (all builds)
MotherboardYANLING YL-WLPC
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230323
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 03:08
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10810U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 177
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 358
42% 323 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 7
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBJ00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1398 1174 1422 1223 1302 1281 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 2055
Write 1,538
Mixed 1,513
SusWrite 1,300
359% 1,602 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 54.3
218% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 754
562% 752 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 261%
Great: 323%
General UDisk 64GB
58GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 25.1
Mixed 2.7
10% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
40% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9D8MR-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical YPC-M3 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Yanling YPC-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback