Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_F412DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_F412DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DA
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 156
57% 101 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 258
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 1831) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.4.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 8.3
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 11.8
8% 8.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SB2 480GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 59 85 69 92 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 388
Write 263
Mixed 278
SusWrite 97.4
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 25.1
93% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 157
126% 178 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC CT4G4SFS824A.M8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 22.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 20.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_F412DA Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DA_F412DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback