Biostar H61MGP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MGP  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 17:47
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 53.2
2-Core 107
51% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 116
20% 138 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Nvidia(10DE 0973) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 11.6
7% 10.6 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 35 30 30 55 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.2% Poor
Read 143
Write 82
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 51.7
19% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 15.2
4K Mixed 8.8
35% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 9.8
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 11.7
9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
479GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 117 115 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 124
Write 107
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 117
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MGP Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MGP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback