Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 58.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 90
52% 83 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 363
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 26.7
15% 19.6 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 13.9
13% 15.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S250G 250GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBJ01101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 1072 698 225 224 166 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 1,178
Write 739
Mixed 947
SusWrite 556
191% 855 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 7.4
34% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 274%
Midasforce 240GB 240GB
17GB free
Firmware: ZD0R3G50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 370 350 377 318 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 238
Write 355
Mixed 251
SusWrite 311
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 17.7
54% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 72.7
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 114
109% 163 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung V-GeN D4S4GL26A16TS5 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 21.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 15.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback