bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2358 x 1289 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 47.3
1-Core 94
2-Core 174
57% 105 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 505
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Vmware SVGA 3D
Vmware(15AD 0405) ≥ 4GB
Driver: vm3dum64_loader.dll Ver. 8.17.3.5
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 41.4
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 52.9
34% 37 fps
MRender 47.3
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 46.9
39% 48.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 512
Write 345
Mixed 408
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 30
102% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 130
99% 134 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 177%
Vmware Virtual NVMe Disk 64GB
45GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 117 102 103 100 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 447
Write 202
Mixed 384
SusWrite 108
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 20.7
85% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 125
91% 118 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.9
60% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback