Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD 3015e Graphics 303 User benchmarks, average bench 28% FT5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 36.5 1-Core 24.9 2-Core 78.9 27% 46.8 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 122 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 126 8% 126 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics 17,211 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 3810) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.32 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0105AELA SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 289 316 196 401 222 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 610 Write 494 Mixed 560 SusWrite 286 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 26.2 4K Mixed 33.6 95% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 412 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 222 183% 268 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 172%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB Row of chips DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 8.9 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
3015e GraphicsAMDBench 28%, 303 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 17,211 samples	1x

SSD
TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GBKbg40zmt128gBench 107%, 1,367 samples	1x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 12,631 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16