Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4210U 82,966 User benchmarks, average bench 41% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 20.8 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 92.6 30% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 147 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 820M 9,266 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 16CD) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	2.69% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 5 Parallax 1.4 2% 3.03 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.69% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L7 256GB 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: MVT04L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 287 296 302 310 318 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	70% Good	Read 309 Write 321 Mixed 295 SusWrite 306 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 23.7 75% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 311 243% 335 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 12GB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance (0^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 5.9 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8 25% 8.63 GB/s	Latency 315 13% 315 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	444x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	117x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	108x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 50%, 1,993 samples	84x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,267 samples	48x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16