Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 191 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 433 43% 351 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34% Below average	Lighting 46.5 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 51.8 38% 44.3 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 47.2 Splatting 23 26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 39%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Walram 1TB 1TB 664 User benchmarks, average bench 153% 880GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2704D Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 488 Write 430 Mixed 217 84% 378 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 11.9 101% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 14.2 72% 160 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 247%
Flash USB Disk 32GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 3a04 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete	Read 16.6 Write 4.7 Mixed 11 12% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0B85 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	57% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.8 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 17.3 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 73%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	44x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	43x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $656

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16