TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI H61M-P25 (G3) (MS-7680)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7680
MotherboardMSI H61M-P25 (G3) (MS-7680)  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 08:48
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1620-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 61.6
1-Core 64.3
2-Core 87.6
45% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 94.4
8-Core 90.9
12% 92.7 Pts
64-Core 91.1
6% 91.1 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 38.7%
 Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Gigabyte(1458 34D6) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.2 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 3
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.7%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cs900 SSD 120GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0200I211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 15 70 13 44 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.8% Poor
Read 167
Write 95.1
Mixed 133
SusWrite 38.5
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 11.2
42% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 122
96% 131 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 27.8%
 Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
320GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 116 117 117 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 68.3
Write 73.5
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 117
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 53.1%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
31.5% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 14.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 31.5%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H61M-P25 (G3) (MS-7680) Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P25 (G3) (MS-7680)

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel  $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples4x
Pentium G645Intel  $70Bench 50%, 5,700 samples3x
Core i7-3770SIntel  $95Bench 69%, 10,699 samples3x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples4x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples3x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples2x
SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD  $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples2x
SSD 120GBCs900Bench 67%, 223 samples2x
Z3_256GB 256GBGeilBench 62%, 143 samples2x
RAM
CT102464BA1339.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 27%, 254 samples3x
EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 8GBUnknownBench 40%, 50 samples2x
78.B1GET.AU00C Kingston 99P5474-010.A00LF 6GBUnknownBench 36%, 8 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $108
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback