Gigabyte GA-B365M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365M H  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '23 at 00:54
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 380
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1260 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 53.5
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 73.5
44% 61.2 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 44.2
44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 159 160 160 159 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 423
Write 403
Mixed 363
SusWrite 168
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 42.6
144% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 347
264% 357 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2OZ 04CB DDR4 3000 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 22.5
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 20.3
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365M H Builds (Compare 2,220 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback