Toshiba Satellite L775

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite L775  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Oneonta Falls
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110822
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 25 '23 at 21:48
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 71.5
45% 65.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 133
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Toshiba(1179 FC60) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 344 332 112 98 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 432
Write 393
Mixed 344
SusWrite 180
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 23
88% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 202
168% 241 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 94%
Toshiba MK5065GSXW 500GB
267GB free
Firmware: GJ003A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 66 67 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 60.3
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 65.2
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.8
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L775 Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L775

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback