Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 99% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180920
Uptime	9.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '23 at 21:28
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$180 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Memory 86.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 247 84% 151 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 775 76% 621 Pts	64-Core 1,036 64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	123% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 187 Parallax 178 135% 177 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 170 Splatting 124 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 123% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 304 306 306 306 305 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 470 Mixed 452 SusWrite 316 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 45.5 148% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 346 262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$199 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 566GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 240 150 150 150 153 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 464 Mixed 391 SusWrite 216 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 40.7 136% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 348 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 122%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 43GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 143 144 143 143 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 334 Mixed 370 SusWrite 169 76% 340 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 70.7 4K Mixed 43 148% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 174 178% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X16GC3000C16K8 2x16GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22.7 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 22 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 115%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 114%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,221x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,182x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	926x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,042x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	799x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	635x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	503x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	492x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	438x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,065

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16