bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel DH55TC
Memory	1.5 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '23 at 00:03
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 69.9 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 143 58% 98.8 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 208 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 352E) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 0.7 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 120GB 5,433 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM01.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 214 217 222 187 27 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.5% Above average	Read 235 Write 184 Mixed 190 SusWrite 180 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 22.6 85% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 151 121% 171 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 159GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 114 114 113 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 113 Write 114 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 114 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 109%
Samsung HD754JJ 750GB 741 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 343GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 113 114 114 119 123 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 103 Write 122 Mixed 65.3 SusWrite 117 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5474-001.A00LF 3GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.7 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,048x
Core i7-2600Intel $124Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,580x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	942x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,144x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,057x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	431x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	519x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	379x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	298x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16