Americanmegatrends E5 Ver:3.2S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAmericanmegatrends E5 Ver:3.2S  (all builds)
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 22:01
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 109
2-Core 212
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 800
73% 613 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 118
Parallax 104
83% 108 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 101
Splatting 91.2
79% 97 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 478
Mixed 432
106% 473 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 49.6
167% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 360
269% 356 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4A 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 42.5
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 103%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5 Ver:3.2S Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Americanmegatrends E5 Ver:3.2S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback