Megaport Phantasy

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMegaport Phantasy  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z590 AORUS MASTER
Memory12.8 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210316
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 18:57
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$220
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 241
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 945
90% 745 Pts
64-Core 1456
90% 1456 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Gainward(10B0 2216) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 248
Parallax 203
177% 223 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 170
Splatting 125
154% 198 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 156%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 449 1371 1453 858 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,278
Write 1,092
Mixed 904
SusWrite 760
226% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 21.7
124% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 629
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 420
316% 434 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 153%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E Hynix HMA851U6CJR6N-VK 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.5% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Phantasy Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 167%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO

System: Megaport Phantasy

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $770
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback