Notebook PCX0DX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook PCX0DX  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook PCx0Dx
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200717
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 16:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10870H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 758
76% 617 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 65E5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 156
Parallax 7.1
5% 56.3 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme LDLC SSD F8PLUS 960GB
646GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 93 191 62 260 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 1,388
Write 1,221
Mixed 883
SusWrite 178
204% 917 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 21.4
135% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 385
326% 470 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 128%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TXS16G2M3200C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PCX0DX Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook PCX0DX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback