Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 24 '23 at 08:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 95.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 226
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 562
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,055
Write 1,978
Mixed 1,694
426% 1,909 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 48.8
191% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,335
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 1,199
876% 1,152 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 507%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
244GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 451 450 446 378 376 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 356
Write 310
Mixed 246
SusWrite 405
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 28.6
103% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 290
231% 322 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Thermaltake Co Ltd R020D408GX2-3200C16A Co Ltd R022D408GX2-3200C16A Co Ltd R020D408GX2-3200C16A Co Ltd R022D408GX2-3200C16A 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 31.3
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 56
72% 56 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 1,516 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback