Acer Swift SFG14-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Swift SFG14-41  (all builds)
MotherboardBCU Dolphin_BCU
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 16:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 69.2
1-Core 157
2-Core 300
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 788
86% 680 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1620) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.32
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.3
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 30
18% 24 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 25
Splatting 22.5
18% 21.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7301Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1468 1531 1275 261 194 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,483
Write 1,482
Mixed 1373
SusWrite 849
292% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 42.7
139% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 567
408% 534 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 177%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 28.6
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SFG14-41 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFG14-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback