Lenovo 90LV0016TW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90LV0016TW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3714
Memory19.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 631
71% 555 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 550X
Device(1642 1865) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.18.03
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 21.2
13% 21.6 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 20
17% 21 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000L7 256GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXH7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2315
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,265
406% 1,833 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 61.8
200% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 957
712% 944 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 279%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
457GB free
Firmware: CC64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 159 159 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 162
Mixed 79
SusWrite 159
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-WM 04CB 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 18.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90LV0016TW Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 90LV0016TW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback