bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive45.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1190 x 758 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 11:31
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Core i7-6700K
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 233
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 476
63% 470 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 129GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 32 31 31 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 417
Write 36.9
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 32.6
31% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 14.5
70% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 100
81% 118 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-8192MB 1x8GB
1 of 128 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 19.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback