Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220303
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 02:56
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 171
2-Core 306
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 937
85% 712 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 85%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.41
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 105
Reflection 85.6
Parallax 91.7
86% 94.1 fps
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 65.2
61% 69.3 fps
Poor: 69% Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNV2S50 500GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2425 1989 895 1484 737 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,781
Write 2,321
Mixed 1,712
SusWrite 1,326
403% 1,785 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 47.9
170% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,575
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,318
988% 1,328 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 264%
Great: 316%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 197 198 196 197 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 206
Mixed 103
SusWrite 197
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 29.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z690 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $763
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback