Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '17 at 07:24
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 225
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 776
72% 602 Pts
64-Core 1,172
72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 1.12
3% 3.18 fps
MRender 4.29
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 3.04
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$175
977GB free
Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 480
Write 337
Mixed 339
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 24.5
96% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 45.3
40% 58.2 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 105%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 402
Mixed 376
156% 719 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 9.79
75% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 30.9
DQ Mixed 15.4
40% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 107%
Great: 144%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 92.4
Write 77.4
Mixed 79.4
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.71
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.62
156% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 26.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback