Huananzhi Gaming TF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemHuananzhi Gaming TF  (all builds)
MotherboardHuananzhi X99-TF Gaming
Memory52.8 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '23 at 14:07
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 824
77% 639 Pts
64-Core 1,176
73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 180
Parallax 168
151% 178 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 139
Splatting 120
119% 149 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN3.0 512GNVMe-M.2/80 512GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN06815 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,562
Write 2082
Mixed 1,583
391% 1,742 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 71.1
238% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 769
565% 749 MB/s
Poor: 128% Great: 307%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
345GB free
Firmware: CV23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 143 141 142 144 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 168
Write 179
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 136
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown YX4U3200E18082C YX4U3200E18082C TAC4U3200E16081C JAD3200U1808 JAD3200U1808 JAD3200U1808 56GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.2% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 30.1
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 20.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gaming TF Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: Huananzhi Gaming TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback