Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-4300M APU-$88 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22% Poor	Memory 37.7 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 43.2 22% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 39.3 8-Core 32.7 5% 36 Pts	64-Core 7.2 0% 7.2 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7420G 1,918 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 180F) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	1.96% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 2 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.96% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89 9,811 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: GHBOA440 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 39 22 33 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 86 Write 56.6 Mixed 33.7 SusWrite 49.8 41% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 214 19% 214 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,518 samples	4x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16