Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER CASPER NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration85 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46% Average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 119
52% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 163
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Device(1B0A 2281) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 11.1
10% 12.7 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 9
7% 9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 395
Mixed 370
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 36
134% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 128
112% 168 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 1315 CT51264BF160BJ.C8F 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback