Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-3420 APU 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 36% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Memory 57.5 1-Core 34.9 2-Core 58.1 34% 50.2 Pts	4-Core 58 8-Core 58.6 8% 58.3 Pts	64-Core 62.8 4% 62.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8589) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	5.5% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 5.9 Parallax 6.8 6% 6.53 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 7.1 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.5% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2M080 73GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102HD SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 47 49 42 49 40 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 193 Write 78.6 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 46.2 20% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 5.1 36% 13.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 44.8 DQ Mixed 26.2 32% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 38%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 615GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 55 56 55 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 49.1 Write 56.2 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 54.4 37% 49.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 6GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.3% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.7 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 18%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	1x
PM871 2.5 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 71%, 2,429 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 24%, 409 samples	2x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 1x4GBMicronBench 26%, 1,487 samples	1x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35