Acer Aspire E5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZORO_BH
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 18:08
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 77.6
39% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 37.1
8-Core 97.7
8% 67.4 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 920M
Acer(1025 098B) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 8.7
5% 6.67 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 216 237 253 107 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 336
Write 200
Mixed 225
SusWrite 149
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 5.9
25% 9.27 MB/s
DQ Read 98.6
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 24
55% 110 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37%
Great: 81%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
586GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 57 60 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 60.9
Mixed 35
SusWrite 57.5
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-573G Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-573G - $680

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback