MSI MS-1785

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GT72VR 6RE
MotherboardMSI MS-1785  (all builds)
Memory38.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160711
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 17:50
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 156
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 481
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 85.9
Reflection 121
Parallax 92.1
70% 99.8 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 94.1
Splatting 102
79% 95.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NY 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 388
Mixed 381
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 30.5
99% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 289
210% 271 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 100
Write 81
Mixed 21.8
49% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 75%
WD My Passport 25E1 2TB
197GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83
Write 65.5
Mixed 50.2
80% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 61%
WD My Book 25ED 4TB
3TB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 160
Mixed 102
179% 146 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 0.7
420% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 0.7
451% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 04CD F4-2400C16-16GRS MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 04CD F4-2400C16-16GRS 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.7
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 20.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1785 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-1785

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback