Lenovo 24415QG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 24415QG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 24415QG
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 14:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 74.3
2-Core 152
56% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 346
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000M
Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB
CLim: 745 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.91
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.53% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 8.6
5% 7.37 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 7.2
6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.53%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 403 408 407 423 384 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 442
Mixed 349
SusWrite 402
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 34.5
111% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 317
234% 307 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-173.A00G 9905428-095.D00LF 9905428-173.A00G 9905428-095.D00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24415QG Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 24415QG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $643
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback