Intel classmate PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel classmate PC  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160520
Uptime91.9 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 14:10
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3010
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Memory 32
1-Core 5.1
2-Core 11.5
13% 16.2 Pts
4-Core 18
8-Core 19.6
2% 18.8 Pts
64-Core 17.7
1% 17.7 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 9809) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.23% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 2.2
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.23%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$33
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0624AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 36 42 37 60 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.5% Poor
Read 176
Write 161
Mixed 149
SusWrite 52.8
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 10
35% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.3
DQ Write 31.1
DQ Mixed 27.4
22% 30.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.51% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 1.6
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.2 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.51%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical classmate PC Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel classmate PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback