Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 2,697 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Memory 33.4 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 86.8 30% 54.1 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 114 17% 123 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 1360) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.14% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 2.2 1% 1.53 fps	MRender 2.5 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.14% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GB 767 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0S03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 716 619 254 271 283 296 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 581 Write 620 Mixed 654 SusWrite 406 128% 565 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 40.6 142% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 208 152% 200 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 201%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	23.1% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 9.2 25% 8.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 235 17% 235 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	223x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	91x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	52x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	370x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	123x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GBKingstonBench 94%, 4,828 samples	81x
OM8PDP3128B-AA1 128GBKingstonBench 107%, 304 samples	61x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	48x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16