Performance Results


Gaming 199% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 169% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	226% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B18
Motherboard	MSI MAG Z390 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B18) (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '23 at 12:27
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$289 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Memory 90.5 1-Core 132 2-Core 268 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 737 77% 617 Pts	64-Core 741 46% 741 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$780 46,082 User benchmarks, average bench 240% MSI(1462 5132) CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	226% Outstanding	Lighting 359 Reflection 345 Parallax 398 293% 367 fps	MRender 495 Gravity 304 Splatting 0.3 189% 266 fps
Poor: 208% ↑ This bench: 226% Great: 256%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Pilot NVMe PCIe M.2 120GB-$53 156 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 76 55 68 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 841 Write 129 Mixed 207 SusWrite 71.2 67% 312 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 44 170% 66.3 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 140 108% 148 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 182%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 186GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 259 340 392 397 383 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 393 Write 356 Mixed 238 SusWrite 367 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 36.9 122% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 266 220% 317 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 137%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 14GB free Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 482 Write 436 Mixed 420 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 45.5 151% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 288 234% 331 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB 44,547 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.2% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 20.4 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 21.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 116%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	757x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	557x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	346x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	303x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	213x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	266x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	250x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	219x

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $718

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16