Aquarius NS685U R11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive236% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAquarius NS685U R11  (all builds)
MotherboardAquarius NS685Is4
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '23 at 09:09
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i3-1125G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 242
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 561
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 570
35% 570 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.89% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 14.4
10% 14 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.3
1% 2.03 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.89%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S036D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 1325 1344 970 46 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 2,276
Write 1,343
Mixed 1,152
SusWrite 835
311% 1,401 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.4
206% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 503
430% 609 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 236%
Great: 244%
USB SG Flash 64GB
23GB free, PID ef18
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 38 19 25 14 0.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 118
Write 45.5
Mixed 100
SusWrite 19.8
86% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 6.7
367% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Foxline FL3200D4S22-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.9% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 12.8
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS685U R11 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Aquarius NS685U R11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback