Dell Latitude E6530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemDell Latitude E6530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07Y85M
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime73.9 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 19:13
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 163
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 374
39% 316 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 298 301 293 282 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 380
Write 305
Mixed 288
SusWrite 292
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 26.5
95% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 185
152% 217 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-065.A00G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6530 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback