Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170515
Uptime	5.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '17 at 22:30
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	76.6% Very good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 668 68% 552 Pts	64-Core 826 51% 826 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 0513) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.1 Reflection 31 Parallax 21.1 14% 23.1 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 14.8 Splatting 33.5 22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$123 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 802GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1228 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 672 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 52 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 140 (F1) Unknown 99 99 22597346865	90.7% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 399 Mixed 401 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 31.1 126% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 85.1 89% 147 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 133%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 174 6150 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1745 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1175 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 730 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 269 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8650 (C2) HDA temperature 125 95 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	67.1% Good	Read 102 Write 132 Mixed 93.7 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.23 62% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 96%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 860GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 109 97 7516 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11864 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12497 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2217 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 748 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 41042 (C2) HDA temperature 119 91 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 21283 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.9% Above average	Read 101 Write 94.1 Mixed 75.6 67% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.43 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 664GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 81 64 136646867 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 144 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 72 60 15793839 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 88304527606112 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 174 (B7) Unknown 90 90 10 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 65 470679580 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3377 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 60129542172 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 120456652783769 (F1) Unknown 100 253 15114987167 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2889482761	63.6% Good	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 111 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.21 64% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 105%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 388GB free Firmware: 0302 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 93.8 Write 93.8 Mixed 90.5 70% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.32 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.22 64% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 66%
ASMT 2105 2TB 569 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 188 Write 193 Mixed 90.7 194% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.05 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.24 53% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 73%
Maxtor 6Y160P0 164GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 22GB free, PID 0351 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.8% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 37.1 Mixed 35.3 46% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40 28,855 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.4% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 26.6 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 26 SC Mixed 21.1 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $686

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)