Lenovo 20EF000NUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20EF000NUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EF000NUS
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 05:52
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 65.6
1-Core 97.2
2-Core 171
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 440
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
Legend(17AA 221E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2591
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 5.1
3% 4.9 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kodak X120 PRO 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA041C90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 342 355 309 66 227 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 418
Write 371
Mixed 339
SusWrite 277
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 28.7
98% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 215
163% 215 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 99U5428-078.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.5
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EF000NUS Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EF000NUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback