Pcware IPMH110G-DDR3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemPcware IPMH110G-DDR3  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH110G-DDR3
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '23 at 02:22
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 197
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 248
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.58
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.2% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 89.5
Parallax 77.1
76% 86.6 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 80
Splatting 71.2
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 133 138 141 139 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 208
Write 91.5
Mixed 186
SusWrite 135
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 25.7
104% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 97.7
89% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55%
Great: 85%
240gb SSD 240GB
182GB free
Firmware: R0815A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 205 214 220 223 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 390
Write 202
Mixed 168
SusWrite 211
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 9.9
70% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 12.6
35% 74.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH110G-DDR3 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Pcware IPMH110G-DDR3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback