bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory44.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1788 x 929 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1008 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221125
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 20:23
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8362
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.3% Average
Memory 31.2
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 104
30% 56.8 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 632
57% 480 Pts
64-Core 855
53% 855 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 805GB
504GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 295 294 291 284 283 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 534
Write 421
Mixed 485
SusWrite 291
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 8.1
27% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 80.2
77% 122 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 4x16GB
4 of 128 slots used
64GB DIMM DRAM clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
194% Outstanding
MC Read 48.7
MC Write 128
MC Mixed 71.9
236% 82.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 248
16% 248 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 194%
Great: 206%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback