Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 19 '23 at 13:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 212
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 473
52% 413 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2121
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.07 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.49
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 30.4
25% 30.1 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 19.5
22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 583 50 496 466 421 396 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,154
Write 1606
Mixed 738
SusWrite 402
219% 975 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 43.3
139% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 500
DQ Mixed 663
484% 638 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 142%
Great: 262%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
56GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 226 77 77 74 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 463
Write 408
Mixed 371
SusWrite 150
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 33.1
104% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 345
260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.1% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 23.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 23.3
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback