HP Pavilion Plus Laptop 14-eh0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Plus Laptop 14-eh0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A95
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230329
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '23 at 20:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 275
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 818
80% 655 Pts
64-Core 691
43% 691 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8A95) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2892
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 48.5
Parallax 48.1
44% 50.2 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 44.6
Splatting 47
35% 42.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 775 885 990 958 1039 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 596
Mixed 660
SusWrite 871
173% 770 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 21.7
79% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 483
DQ Write 71.5
DQ Mixed 148
142% 234 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 128%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H5ANAG6NCJR-XNC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 27
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Plus Laptop 14-eh0xxx Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Plus Laptop 14-eh0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback