HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-08xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-08xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844C
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210805
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '23 at 05:50
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 143
57% 97 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 388
45% 352 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.4% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 105
Parallax 121
94% 114 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 117
Splatting 92.7
99% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80000C00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 572
Write 499
Mixed 471
114% 514 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 24.5
69% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 457
DQ Mixed 502
372% 492 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 164%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
614GB free
Firmware: HPH4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 179
Write 172
Mixed 74.7
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 23
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-08xx Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 790-08xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $392
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback