HP 500-490nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-490nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 22:53
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 183
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 467
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Nvidia(10DE 16FB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 169
Parallax 159
143% 168 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 132
Splatting 115
121% 154 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 129%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 153 96 56 65 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 441
Write 308
Mixed 342
SusWrite 106
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 25
103% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 166
152% 228 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
270GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 90 90 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 87.1
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 89.9
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-490nf Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-490nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback