Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive443% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster MARKUT M7 V5.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER MARKUT M7 V5.1
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 59.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 326
95% 184 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 987
97% 796 Pts
64-Core 1,353
84% 1,353 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 1305) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 170
Parallax 11.5
8% 63.8 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 7.6
8% 10.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2730 3172 3208 2942 2727 1660 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
443% Outstanding
Read 2749
Write 2,759
Mixed 2,717
SusWrite 2,740
619% 2,741 MB/s
4K Read 75.3
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 106
346% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,365
DQ Write 1,229
DQ Mixed 1,297
973% 1,297 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 443%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FB 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 24.2
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 13.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MARKUT M7 V5.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Monster MARKUT M7 V5.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback