HP 400-335d

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 400-335d  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 05:28
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 192
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 325
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
Palit(1569 F278) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 212
Parallax 203
188% 215 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 163
Splatting 132
142% 181 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 158%
Great: 170%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 254 287 297 281 294 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 484
Write 468
Mixed 392
SusWrite 281
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 14.4
111% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 342
259% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 8.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 7.5
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 400-335d Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 400-335d

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback