Asus A8N-SLI Premium

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A8N-SLI Premium  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '17 at 14:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84
Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 66
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 54.2
35% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 52
8-Core 54.5
7% 53.2 Pts
64-Core 57.5
4% 57.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2600-XT
MSI(1462 0990) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 2.87
Reflection 5.54
Parallax 1.34
2% 3.25 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 5
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.8% Below average
Read 120
Write 88
Mixed 93.2
22% 100 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 14.5
64% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 15.5
16% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 115%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
209GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 83.5
Write 70.5
Mixed 28.1
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.34
101% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A8N-SLI Premium Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A8N-SLI Premium

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $242
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback