TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 17 '23 at 00:21
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 72.1
2-Core 163
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 350
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 63.3%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1332) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3623
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.1% Good
Lighting 84.7
Reflection 126
Parallax 80.1
69% 96.9 fps
MRender 97.6
Gravity 78.6
Splatting 71.4
66% 82.5 fps
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 68.1%
 Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 843 823 982 896 403 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 914
Write 1,271
Mixed 923
SusWrite 711
216% 955 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 34
115% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 540
DQ Write 456
DQ Mixed 472
360% 489 MB/s
Poor: 115% ↑
This bench: 138%
 Great: 372%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
882GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 93 93 94 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 84.8
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 93.1
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.8
195% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 56.3%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 859B CB8GS2666.C8JT 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 19.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 20.7
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 67.3%
 Great: 85%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 11,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples5,746x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples2,891x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples2,689x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples6,029x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples3,493x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples945x
SSD
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples1,222x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples1,038x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples747x
RAM
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 2,420 samples854x
ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,751 samples761x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples736x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback