HP ProDesk 405 G8 Desktop Mini PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 405 G8 Desktop Mini PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8882
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 18:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64% Good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 226
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 697
56% 495 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 64%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 8882) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.4.3
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 6.2
3% 8.23 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 4.6
10% 13.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
537GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 423 1108 878 962 826 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,587
Write 1,331
Mixed 1501
SusWrite 823
294% 1,311 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 38.8
128% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 251
215% 310 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 169%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9808] KD4AGS88C-32N220D 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
94% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 33.5
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 12.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 405 G8 Desktop Mini PC Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP ProDesk 405 G8 Desktop Mini PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback