Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221107
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 16:34
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Memory 4.89
1-Core 55.4
2-Core 77.5
23% 45.9 Pts
4-Core 94
8-Core 95.9
13% 94.9 Pts
64-Core 78.6
5% 78.6 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.3
3% 4 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4
Splatting 8
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK 512GB 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103L0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 111 124 222 108 524 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 466
Write 392
Mixed 331
SusWrite 218
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 7.2
25% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 210%
Team TM8PS7001T 1TB
941GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 183 176 244 241 258 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.6% Below average
Read 235
Write 199
Mixed 206
SusWrite 223
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 5.1
23% 7.43 MB/s
DQ Read 91.7
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 48.2
46% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.2
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 454
9% 454 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback