Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '23 at 12:21
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 62
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
73% 137 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 908
80% 681 Pts
64-Core 2,254
140% 2,254 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
AMD(1002 1002) ≥ 4GB; RX7900XT
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 75
Reflection 75
Parallax 596
61% 249 fps
MRender 75
Gravity 236
Splatting 429
223% 247 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 113%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 623 611 597 611 618 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,995
Write 2,054
Mixed 1,689
SusWrite 683
360% 1,605 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.5
199% 71.1 MB/s
DQ Read 892
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 799
575% 748 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 216%
Great: 288%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
419GB free
Firmware: 711240WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1933 1921 1883 926 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,167
Write 1919
Mixed 1,569
SusWrite 1,149
329% 1,451 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.8
212% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 931
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 855
624% 820 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 218%
Great: 296%
Toshiba MK5059GSX 500GB
91GB free
Firmware: GK003U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 56.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 57.7
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 42%
WD WD22PURZ-85B4ZY0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 157 163 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 130
Write 156
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 160
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
174% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
281GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 89 88 91 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 73.3
Write 97.7
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 87.9
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.2
136% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 71%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
765GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 77 78 78 78 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 81.8
Write 84.8
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 77.8
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3200C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 50
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 127%
Great: 188%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,466
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback